Wednesday, December 28, 2016
Club Racing needs a paradigm shift
Auto racing in general, began with two manufacturers pitting disparate designs against each other. As it became commercialized and "the show" was more important than validating a product, BOP adjustments became the norm. Amateurs dream about pro racing but never consider that it is fundamentally, a cost ineffective method of providing close competition. Club racers come and go as budgets briefly bloom then evaporate like the tire smoke they generate. We have to rethink the paradigm by building a series that borrows little from pro racing. The biggest and most painful step is removing the car from the equation. This means one platform, no nooks and crannies in the rules that reward spending wars. Carefully choosing a spec tire that is competitive right down to the cord. Points tables that reward consistency over a few wins. Those are the building blocks. The mortar, as it were, is the mission statement of supporting and coaching both new and experienced drivers from within the series. It should be about the drivers experience, not the fans, promoters or manufacturers. SRF is the largest club racing series in the US and follows this formula. Supermiata was created in the same vein. One single specification for all cars, easily met and monitored performance caps. Native coaching from the "leaders" or most experienced drivers in the series. Inverted grids, short races.Sponsored BBQ for drivers and crew with high quality catered food and beverages Saturday night. Racing now becomes less about the anxiety of the car's competitiveness and more about the excitement of expanding your knowledge under the wing of the pros and national champions running at the front. We're doing things a new way and if the growing field sizes and general buzz are any indication, it is what the drivers have always wanted. Looking forward to 2017 with two new classes and expansion to the east coast with WRL. See you in grid!
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
I am branded
Yes I am an asshole. That is because I stubbornly refuse to spoon
feed those individuals that ask a question based on several layers of
misconceptions and are insulted when I don't stop to either give them the
answer they want to hear or take the time to explain why their question doesn't
make any sense. For this, I am thus labeled.
I have a choice to spend a not inconsiderable
amount of time walking the customer through all the reasons they are asking the
wrong question. To be blunt, we are not
here for that. We make parts. They are good parts, priced fairly, shipped
quickly and perform as advertised. Got a
simple question about one of our products? We'll handle it. Got a giant, open ended
question based on years of misinformation and conjecture that we know won't
actually help you to attempt to answer? We'll redirect you to our website, or a
forum somewhere so you can do some additional research. We do this because it
is not any company's obligation or responsibility to be your" best friend
that knows a lot about cars". It is
a pragmatic choice, though not always a popular one.
Got a
tech question entirely unrelated to anything we sell? We'll redirect. We
will do this even if we know the answer. Why? Same reason as above.
We could, simply
answer every question ever posed to us to the best of our knowledge, in perpetuity.
In fact, I did this for the first few years of my current business. After a few years, I realized I was the only
one in our little niche industry doing so. I also realized it was costing me
almost a day a week. That's expensive and something we could not afford. Some
of those customers would eventually buy something, most would not. So I
gradually learned to filter questions pertaining to our products from the general
"I'm clueless, impatient and it's
your fault if I can't find an answer" inquiries. Thus the reaction from
some individuals.
Communicate with any
large company with such a impossible or convoluted question. You will usually get
a patronizing, canned answer that does nothing to help you. Now try to get the
owner of the company on the line for a "straight" answer. What? You mean that's not possible? If you could,
there is pretty good chance they would also not have a satisfactory answer
anyway.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)